Archive for the ‘Blog’ Category
The two notoriously addictive and challenging 3D racing games produced for the Nintendo 64 were Mario Kart 64, developed by Nintendo and released on February 10th 1997, and Diddy Kong Racing, developed by Rareware and released on the 21st of November 1997. Both games skyrocketed in sales and popularity, with Diddy Kong selling over 4.5 million copies and Mario Kart selling over 9 million copies. The outrageous sales of Mario Kart 64 was arguably due to the fact that the characters were previously known and established by Nintendo in previous games, whilst the characters featured on Diddy Kong Racing were generally new installments.
In fact, Nintendo used Diddy Kong Racing as a platform to set up new characters to be released in other Nintendo games; these were characters such as Banjo the bear (the Banjo Kazooie series following) and Conker the Squirrel (the infamous Conkers Bad Fur Day followed). But the age old debate between old school and retro gamers remains: which was better? There are hardcore advocates and arguments on both sides, some of which we will take a look at.
Typically racing games do not have or need a strong storyline. It is arguable that if people have bought a racing game, they want to race vehicles around a track, not play an action adventure. There are certain disadvantages including a storyline, such as once you have taken all of the available cars for a spin around every track, where is there to go from there?
Mario Kart 64 has no discernible storyline – effectively, Mario and his friends have all gathered together and decided to race – that is simply it. On the other hand, Diddy Kong Racing has a developed, all be it mental, storyline. It involves Wizpig, an alien pig from space, trying to take over an island that a tiger has been put in charge of… and there’s a flying elephant at some stage… it’s crazy. However, this injects a huge element of fun into the gameplay. When you have a known adversary to eventually race against, it spurs you on and gives you the drive to race again and again.
This is what Mario Kart 64 is missing. The argument is that a single player mode that involves racing against the other characters again and again with minimal dimensions to the story don’t give you a drive to continue playing for hours and hours on end.
Within Mario Kart 64, every track has been extremely well thought out and detailed, complete with the music reflecting the mood and feel of each track. You always know which track is your favourite and which one is your worst because they are all extremely distinct from each other.
When looking at the racing courses on Diddy Kong Racing, so many tracks evoke a feeling of unremarkability. Having played both, I couldn’t tell you which is my favourite Diddy Kong course, but I can instantly recall my favourite Mario Kart track (it’s Toad’s Turnpike).
The controls in Mario Kart 64 are, unfortunately for Diddy Kong Racing, unparalleled. Both the responsiveness and the terrain interaction match perfectly to give an accurate representation of each player’s ability at the game itself. Diddy Kong Racing, on the other hand, struggles to match up to the same level of responsiveness, and the terrain can make the game almost unplayable on some of the (ice) levels.
The vehicle selection in Diddy Kong gives you access to a selection of cars, planes, and hovercrafts. This, whilst giving more of a variety of gameplay to a gamer, has upsides and downsides. The hovercraft is extremely hard to control, cornering like a golf buggy on ice. The planes, although fun, have issues with certain tracks as it is seemingly impossible to turn a corner without crashing into a wall. Even with these detrimental aspects, the vehicle diversity keeps the tracks interesting and challenging.
In Mario Kart, you can develop your technique with each character, but after playing the game for a long time you get so used to the tracks and vehicles behaviour that the game becomes less challenging. This can lead to getting bored with playing the game, which is obviously the opposite effect that the developers wanted.
There is no discernible winner in this category; both games have a great multiplayer component to them. Mario Kart has been supported as being the better of the two for group racing and battle rounds, but I think this is more a matter of personal preference.
Although both games have great attributes to them, I believe that Mario Kart 64 is the winner. This is purely down to reflective talent in the controls and weapon base that the game possess. Although Diddy Kong Racing has a great free roaming edge to the gamer platform, Mario Kart‘s developed tracks and notable characters are unforgettable. In the debate about what’s a better video game, sometimes the effort into developing and making them is forgotten. Product design consultants and software design companies work hard to achieve the best gaming experience for their audience base, and I think that they should be commended with both titles in creating two fantastic and distinct racing games.
As time ticks by the threshold of what is considered nostalgic and retro grows exponentially. I dare not even define the term or the guidelines one may foolishly attempt to place on what would even be appropriate for a site like this. At the going rate of Internet coverage I could probably justify reviewing a game a month old or that has recently earned a price drop as retro, it’s all relative. Still, there is a place for looking fondly back at gaming days passed but it is important to realize that with the ongoing clutter of fan created gaming sites that we all do our part to stand out. I don’t want to read articles about things I already know, I want to read articles about things no one knows. This is why you don’t see much coverage of Super Mario World or reviews of the latest virtual console releases – too many have already done it before. When you set out to talk about the past, try to impress with what unique items you can bring to the table, not recycling.
It’s a hard road to figure out what to cover and frankly we tend to migrate to what we know best, but remember that as a consumer product there were so many copies of Super Mario Bros. 3 that perhaps one does not need to review it for the thousandth time. I may be off base, but I propose that anyone talking about old games either try to cover what has rarely been touched before or bring a new angle. Also it’s important to understand that with different eras ushers different players and neither is the correct opinion. I scoff at the people who played pinball in the 70s and 80s and tell me that I should play a real man’s game and put aside kiddie video games. In that same regard I know there are plenty of you out there who want to dismiss me immediately for feeling that N64 bred few winners, especially when you find out I like Shadows of the Empire and don’t much care for Goldeneye. It’s all perspective. So here is a fun list of rules I have created when delving into the games of the past that hopefully you will find helpful.
Embrace the Faults of your Favorites
This month we are playing Super Metroid for the game club. Having now completed the game, I get why it can be considered by some to be the greatest title of all time and yet others can’t figure out why the hell I knew to look for all the wacky hidden paths and items in that game. It’s simple, I just pretend I’m back to that time and start to think like the designers of that time. I knew the landscape, I knew the game concepts, and I knew the style, but unless I acknowledge what was going on at the time Super Metroid is not a competitor to today’s titles, especially when you consider the wall jump. This is true of any game in the past and it will be true of any game today when more than a decade has passed. Another great example is my favorite title: Resident Evil. I get a little excited every time I boot that game up, in any iteration it was available for, and I happen to own it more than 10 times over on as many different consoles. It is undeniably my favorite title, but I dare not say it is the best game of all time, this simply isn’t true. To play and appreciate Resident Evil means that you have to appreciate long load times, slow pacing and reaction time, one-hit kills late in the game that can set you back 30+ minutes, and endless backtracking. It’s not for everyone, but it impressed a great many at the time of its release.
Appreciation Without Masochism
There are a great deal of influential games that paved the way to many staples in contemporary game design. Some of these titles, like Chrono Trigger, withstand the test of time and are great to replay today. Others, like Half Life 2, don’t quite hold up when compared to the sea of first-person shooters that grace the walls of most game collections. I know it’s mean to pick on Valve’s baby, one of the highest rated games of all times, and probably the title that created all of our favorite shooter franchises but that game just doesn’t hold up. Graphically, thanks to the Source engine, it can still look nice, but it doesn’t play nice. First person platforming, pathetic pseud0 jet ski controls, blocky mindless monologues, and the annoying thin-wire-under-the-bridge sequence aren’t exactly what today’s gamer views as fun. Sure if you desperately want to know the building blocks of the franchise/genre or go into it with an open mind there’s no denying the innovation it reveals, but you don’t have to play it to appreciate that. Just do a quick search for “Half Life 2″ and you will be blasted with endless articles explaining, justifying, dissecting, and begging for a return to this title – no gameplay required. This and countless other titles are games you should know and be aware of when brought up in conversation but the twelve-hour romp of the main campaign and the so-so follow-up episodes are really only there as a reminder, not an all-powerful example through the ages of how to make an FPS. Oh, and just in case you don’t think I can slam my own favorites, just know that I consider Deus Ex to very much be in this same category.
Try It Before You Buy It
Just like illegally downloading music tracks, gamers tackle emulation much in the same fashion – it’s illegal, it’s wrong, and everyone does it. Putting aside the dark and brooding side effect of playing games illegally on the take, emulation also allows you to experience a game before pulling the trigger of buying it on a digital service or *gasp* for the skyrocketed prices of classic collections. How many of you have played N20: Nitrous Oxide? It’s quite an intriguing title that seemingly combines tempest, Starfox, the effect of tripping, and songs by The Crystal Method. I find it to be a fascinating game that’s fun to pull up and blast away at from time to time. It’s also a niche title so perhaps before you drop even a measly $6 for it on PSN you might want to test drive it. This is where emulation can be a friend and asset. Think of emulators as demo consoles, allowing you to get involved in the first 30-60 minutes of a game and, if you are convinced, a way to justify purchasing it. You can try tons of games, most of which you hopefully have never heard of or not touched, and decide which is going to be the next retro gem for your collection. Technology works for us, not against us, and no one can afford to buy every old school game they don’t know or heard something good about. When you find that magical title, write your thoughts. I’m always interested in finding out why someone today was compelled to play something from the past, especially if it isn’t well-known or liked.
Retro gaming is an endless web of unique gameplay, technological breakthroughs, fascinating adventures, and utter trash. When you choose to explore, dissect, or cover these titles it’s optimal to do and play something original. Keep that in mind when it comes down to replaying Grand Theft Auto Vice City for the tenth time or giving Shinobi a go. You may find that the game talked about the least becomes the title you cherish the most.
Zelda II: The Adventures of Link, Shin Megami Tensei Persona, Ikaruga, Dark Souls. All of these games have one thing in common: they are hard as hell. Since the genesis of the video game difficulty has existed to be the barrier to entry and the extension of game experiences. What is a video game if not a challenge? Originally technology had not caught up with the goals of the medium so games had to use difficulty to bridge the gap of a good experience where visuals and storytelling failed. Nowadays games are just as capable, if not more, than other media in being an interactive experience and therefore difficulty steps aside most times. I consistently hear that the concept of difficulty is dead, that a hard game dictates a good game, and that today’s gamers are weak and catered to. Frankly, I disagree with all of that. Gaming is typically tech dependent and with that dependence comes the evolution of experience, which results in the evolution of difficulty. Games haven’t gotten harder or easier, they have simply evolved.
I think the question of how difficult a game is comes to the amount of time you spend with it, which is why games seem easier today. Traditionally the challenge was intended to get you to play the game more often, justifying the high price tag for a relatively short experience. Take Contra for example, I cleared that game on this very site in roughly half an hour without using any codes. This is not an easy feat for many gamers and definitely much harder for those that didn’t grow up playing the game. While it may have only taken me 30 minutes, there are tens of hours of practice spanning more than 25 years that led up to that run. In contrast, I could not conquer Ghosts’n’Goblins and finally gave up after two hours. There is someone out there who is the exact opposite as me and it’s most likely based on what they have played. This is transparently due to memorization – once you know exactly what is going to happen to the point that the game becomes manageable. The best way to memorize something is to repeat it over and over. Enter the first generation of the difficulty.
Parallel to this initial outing in repetition and memorization comes reflex. Some of you reading that last paragraph may be thinking more of games like Punch-Out!! or even a PowerPad game like Stadium Events that require you to have the skill to conquer them. It doesn’t matter if you’ve memorized Bald Bull’s charge, if you can’t nail the timing of hitting him in the stomach you’re either repeating the dodge till the end of the round or eating canvas. Either way, you’ll never win. Being able to conquer a skill set, nail timing, and basically having the reflexes to perform complex tasks in games like Super Mario Bros. 2 (Lost Levels in the US) either enabled or prevented your ability to win.
Finally there were the dick programmers. Like it or not they didn’t have an appropriate way to blanket difficulty so they were forced to fudge it. This explains such terrible games as Beat Takeshi’s Challenge, Battletoads, and Silver Surfer where being good at the game or memorizing how to beat it meant nothing because the game invariably stacks the odds against you. Repeating an area is one thing but forcing someone into game over screen after game over screen to the point of insanity with nothing but unsavable hours to retread the past is not fun. These games are not fun. They are only used for the purpose of masochism.
From that point they just continued to evolve in a regular pattern until you get the games of today. Nowadays the point of many games is to tell a tale rather than post a challenge, resulting in games like Heavy Rain that have no end game state. On the other hand some of the biggest and oldest gaming tropes hold true. Dark Souls is nothing more than a memorization game, as are any of the bullet hell shmups you may enjoy today. The game never changes its course, it always spawns the same enemies in the same way – many argue to alter this mechanic would navigate it to the “not fun” hard status. Dance Dance Revolution and Guitar Hero/Rock Band are also nothing more than reflex gameplay, requiring that you not only understand what to do, but perform actual physical tasks to achieve your goal. I think the only difference to games today and from the past is the unknown.
Imagine playing The Legend of Zelda for the first time today. I will fully admit that I can breeze through this title in no time, having little fear of taking on Gannon at the end, but then I grew up playing it and knowing its intricacies. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone today that hasn’t played it dedicate the time it would take to figure out the mechanics, find the secrets like where to get hearts and the location of dungeons, and finally complete the game. If that person were to go online, you may accuse them of making the game unfairly easy or cheating to get ahead. This is why people criticize Dark Souls and those that generate guides to get it. It also explains why it’s so popular; gamers get to return to those better days where you have to figure the world out. Also keep in mind that like Dark Souls, it may not be just about memorization or reflexes, but both, which creates a whole new barrier for entry. Still, there will always be those games that are not fun and unnaturally hard for no reason, and for games like Knight’s Contract I say good riddance and the world is a better place without you.
The term “arcade game” these days conjures up images of cutting-edge graphics and sound, combined with innovative and interactive technology that can bring any concept to life. However, good graphics and interactivity have not always been a necessity for a game that is both enjoyable and addictive. I dread to mention the recent phenomenon of the Flappy Bird app but it is an example of an outrageously faulty and basic game becoming extremely popular. This has been seen in the past with games like Space Invaders, Pac Man, Tetris and Asteroids following very basic concepts and graphics, but still being addictive and rewarding when completed.
The Really Early Days
The first arcade games kicked off at amusement parks and are still present at fairs and theme parks, but there’s nothing particularly sophisticated about them. Ring toss, throwing balls at stacked cans, shooting targets, and other simple challenges have been doing the rounds for hundreds of years and can still draw in the punters to this day. Just don’t go expecting an easy win. Perhaps this is what is indicative of a good game – making it appear simple whilst making it actually fiendishly difficult to win. Make it too hard, however ,and you are left with Zelda II.
The introduction of the electric element into arcade games in the 1930s completely revolutionized pinball, which had existed as a spring-loaded tabletop ball game since the 17th century, and the advent of player controlled flippers in the 1940s solidified pinball’s reputation as a classic favourite amongst arcade gamers. Pinball continues to be a popular game to this day with digitized versions adding to the range of machines available. The Japanese even have their own variant of Pinball called “Pachinko’” which features multiple smaller balls in play all at the same time.
The Beginning of the Computer Age
The 1970s was the dawn of computer-based games. Rather than mechanical amusements, which had up until this point held sway. The seminal Pong was released in 1972 and in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s a swathe of arcade classics were released including Space Invaders, Asteroids, Pac-Man, and Donkey Kong. Game cabinets took their lead from pinball table designs but featured digital monitors and player-controlled joysticks and input buttons to control the action on screen rather than physically manipulating items, as in earlier amusement games. Anyone who was lucky enough to be alive at this great time will tell you that Pong was very addictive.
Late 80s Into the 90s – The Birth of the Games Console
SEGA MEGADRIVE – Release Date – October 29, 1988
The Sega Genesis (or Sega Mega Drive outside the US) saw the beginning of the developed console, bringing games like Sonic The Hedgehog, Pat Riley Basketball and Mortal Kombat to life. This product was unwittingly the start of a new generation of gaming. With most of the games relying on reflex and timing, they relied on the same instincts that were instilled in the general population from old arcade games.
GAME BOY – Release Date – April 21, 1989
The Game Boy saw a different kind of gaming completely. The handheld device was a revolutionary idea, and the death of every gamers social life. When I was a youngster I would literally take the bulky object everywhere I went, just for a few more goes on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or Super Mario Land 2: Six Golden Coins. Again, the product design of the Game Boy was very simple, whilst the hardware and software were complex at the time of its release, showing that product design does not necessarily have to be complicated to be popular.
SNES – Release Date – November 21, 1990
What a machine. As a proud owner of a SNES, I have to say that the hours spent in front of the console were some of the best of my childhood. If you think this is sad then you obviously haven’t played the original Super Mario Kart, Street Fighter II or Donkey Kong Country. The design of the console and indeed of the games themselves worked extremely well. It never tried to be too extravagant or design based, simply slot the cartridge in the top (after blowing on it, of course) and you’re in gamer land. Nintendo skyrocketed in popularity with games being created in house and by third parties like Capcom. The product design of the console meant that they could improve the graphics and make a significant move from 2D platform games. Eventually this design would give us the hallowed Nintendo 64, which brought out games such as Banjo Kazooie, GoldenEye, and Mario Kart 64.
Shift Towards The Physical
Fighting games such as Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter II gathered huge followings whilst racers such as Daytona USA developed the trend of simulating an actual in-car experience. Gun games also developed so that players held an imitation weapon and fired at on-screen targets. In 1998, Dance Dance Revolution (DDR) marked a shift towards physical actions and computer inputs being combined. Players “dancing” on arrow pads would try to stay in time with a selected track, simultaneously watching the rhythm and timing displayed on-screen.
This has now led to new product designs and consoles that promote active movement. Consoles such as the Wii and the Xbox One now have the player standing up, moving around, and using themselves as the controller in many games. The future of product design in the gaming industry has never been predictable, but we can see that there is definitely a paradigm shift in the way that people are viewing gaming experiences and indeed the target audience for games.
Increased physical interaction has incorporated all manner of activities that have now been made available in arcade format. Football, guitar, drums, shooting, driving, and many more pastimes have been translated into interactive games with motion control, eye tracking, and other modern features common in today’s games. DCA’s design for the X-Putt, a golf putting game, shows how a design idea and inventive product can combine to create a novel and fun experience for gamers.
Normally I wouldn’t be speaking to the modern gaming scene, but the overall backlash toward Nintendo is that they are failing with the Wii U and they need to fix it now. The first statement is unarguably true, and despite the second statement being more of an opinion, it’s one that Nintendo also shares. From the outset of the Wii U’s supposed and later confirmed failure, my peers on the Internet and beyond that at larger video game media venues have taken it upon themselves to suggest what Nintendo should do to fix this problem (just look at this simple search). Needless to say the vocal minority in message boards have also role-played as CEO and declared their plans on how to “fix” Nintendo with suggestions that vary from practical to downright stupid. This illustrates one of the largest problems in gaming today: the public.
I’m not sure quite when the Facebook generation took over, but ever since social media has boomed it has been handled in a very irresponsible way. At first people were just plain rude due to anonymity, however now we see people who blatantly admit to their real names and even in public have brought out this behavior. Internet rudeness has become commonplace. With it so has any sort of credibility for sources of accurate information and inevitably the whole world thinking they are important. Well Nintendo doesn’t need your help and wouldn’t do well to follow it.
I wouldn’t be doing my job if I didn’t get all historical on you readers. Nintendo was founded as a simple hanafuda card company in the late 1800s, progressed into various markets like instant ramen and even love hotels before the Hiroshi Yamauchi eventually entered into the video game market. Even Nintendo’s first console was released in the dark times after the video game crash and there have been countless times in history where the decisions of Nintendo have been called into question just before massive success occurs (this was covered in my Hiroshi Yamauchi podcast if you’re interested). Logic dictates that for a company that has existed more than a century and currently has a war chest of billions of yen that perhaps the average gamer that has only lived about 20-40 years and has no experience actually making games or running a company may be ill-equipped to be giving advice. Still, Nintendo didn’t build that war chest to hemorrhage it and investors will not stand for much more failure without drastic change, but the most popular suggestions suck. Even I, the low retro games blogger can shred through some that seem ideal at first and pathetic when examined:
- Nintendo should move to mobile gaming: This is a popular one. Oh sure, if Nintendo brought Mario to your iPhone or Android you would most certainly buy it, right? A suggestion popular among people who refuse to purchase the comparatively low priced 3DS/2DS consoles seem to be the last person I expect to buy these products. Furthermore the mobile gaming space is the most risky, pathetic, and flooded world of gaming in existence. Almost no one hails it as a proper business strategy and everything I’ve ever read suggests that the only successful game is a price-gouging or bad game (Game Industry covered the mobile gaming space here). For a company that has the portable gaming market down to a science, I don’t think Nintendo gains a thing with mobile gaming. Companion apps, on the other hand, may not be much but at least peers EA, Ubisoft, and several others are trying it with varied success and little to no financial risk.
- Nintendo should drop out of console gaming and go pure software on that front: Did you learn nothing from Sega? Now, to be clear, I’m not saying that Sega made the wrong choice, but that company was in a completely different place. What I mean is that for decades we sat and pondered what Mario would look like on a Sega platform and Sonic on a Nintendo one. When it finally happened on the GameCube, few cared. Sonic set no records, even for established solid titles like Sonic Adventure. I think the concept of Mario being on the PS4 or Xbox One are more tempting than the reality of Mario on those consoles. Furthermore, if you’re not going to spend $250 to get Mario on Wii U, why in the world should Nintendo shell out licensing fees and give up its biggest money-making franchises to come out on a $500 console? Not to mention the struggles they’ve had developing on their own hardware, what do you think the dev time will be on another company’s hardware?
- Drop the price of the Wii U: I keep hearing this argument from gamers time and time again, “if they would just drop the price I would buy it.” Bull. Wii U was $350 and now it’s $300 with one of three included game options and you still didn’t buy it. Meanwhile PS4 and Xbox One are at a staggering $400 and $500 price tag respectively, have even less games than the struggling Wii U, and are moving millions of units a month. Many like to say it’s the promised potential, but as any Nintendo enthusiast will point out, many of the most anticipated games on those consoles (like Black Flag and even Call of Duty, which even I in an earlier draft of this article didn’t think was on the console) are on or planned for the Wii U. This still doesn’t speak to the obvious lack of Battlefield, I know, but it’s not exactly like there’s zero potential. Even more, you lack faith that Nintendo has some heavy hitters coming? Well if so, moving development to PS4/XBO/PC like suggested in the last point will not help that. Wii U goes any lower it will be seen as not only an inferior struggling console, but a cheap alternative to a “real” gaming platform. Oh and before you suggest dropping the tablet for a drop, it will reduce the cost, tops, $25 and I still go back and say gamers are happily shelling out $100 more for the Kinect in the Xbox One, another peripheral no one asked for (meanwhile you can’t find Playstation cameras on store shelves for some odd reason).
- Nintendo needs to release more “classic” and “hardcore” games: NES Remix can only truly be appreciated by those that grew up with these games in my eyes, and even if you don’t agree with me there’s no doubt this is a hardcore gamer-centric title. Bayonetta 2 is solely for the hardcore, it will not perform well. The same can be said for Wonderful 101, Zombii U, and even if you didn’t bite at them, the myriad of 3rd party titles that premiered on the console and died a miserable sales-free death. Nintendo listened and you spit in its face, gamers, just like you did EA a few years back that caused them to do the horrid practices they now do to survive. Nintendo is even in danger of releasing its strongest franchises too often and you all have the balls to ask them to bring something new? New IP are known to be high risk and rarely succeed in the first iteration.
Nintendo has a long hard road ahead of it, but one I feel confident they can work themselves out of. The current plan of branching out to other areas of non-gaming culture and branching out the business means that Nintendo may not have to care as much how well (or poor) its games perform. But for Christ’s sake stop making suggestions, they all suck. I’m humble enough to realize that I haven’t seen any good suggestions and I don’t personally know the answer. Oh and you Wii U hardcore fanboys: take it easy, you’re having fun with your console and that’s what matters.
We are here, the moment has arrived, the hype machine open Android device for homes known as the Ouya was recently released to the masses. I haven’t heard much from the retail or consumer market yet, but it’s become abundantly clear that tech sites and gaming sites seem to have two different opinions when it comes to the palm-sized silver box. At $100 the promise of an HDMI compliant device on your television that plays games, this Kickstarter funded project has promise, but as far as practicality is concerned it’s far from impressive. The simple question is, “do I want it?” As a retro gamer (and a retro web site) Gaming History 101 is within that niche that can almost without a doubt say “yes,” but before you go running off to buy it, best you know what you’re actually getting first.
My thoughts on the design and innards of the Ouya have already been addressed on this site, so feel free to read about them and come back later. Nothing has changed; this console always was and continues to be an underperforming Android device that is further held back because of the tether to a controller. You cannot pick up the Ouya and download any Android app you want, they need to be reprogramed to support the controller, which the early software library reveals not many have jumped on board for. Furthermore the controller kinda sucks, but this opinion also has a mass split so feel free to try it out for yourself before trusting my judgement. Put it all together and you have nothing more than a lackluster console with a rubbish controller that only plays a handful of games (although some titles like TowerFall apparently help justify the potential). For the typical consumer, like my wife or mother, there’s no reason to get this – everything they want already plays on any Android device and no typical consumer is buying a $100 console for TowerFall.
Then there’s the caveat, the secret weapon, the compelling factor so necessary to the initial success of the Ouya that the creators casually make sure to mention it every time they are interviewed: it’s one hell of an emulation machine. My thoughts and feeling on emulation are quite clear, again feel free to read my detailed article and the more broad podcast on the subject for background, but when you deal with the expense of retro gaming $100 is a banger of a deal for a one-stop shop. In this regard, the underpowered Ouya rises above and emulates almost every video game from 1977-2000 with ease. Not only that, the openware apps that allow for emulation are provided, for free, in abundance, under the “retro” section of the Ouya’s menus. Additionally those unhappy with the controller can sync a Playstation 3 controller to the device with no modification (get the newest firmware) thanks to the bluetooth built into it. Couple that with emulators and you are ready to re-live your past with decent results on a dazzling big screen with a rock solid controller. There’s a flip side to this argument, and exactly why I won’t be picking it up, but for most people this is a great blast to the past on the cheap.
Now for the nerd stuff. Of course elitists in the retro gaming world will have their own opinions, I being one of them, that is a deal breaker. First of all, I feel that emulation was invented because gamers didn’t have a better option. There were times when finding retro consoles wasn’t easy, it was and still is very expensive, and many of the retro games we love never even came out here so fan translations are a must. That is where emulation is beneficial, that is why it’s promoted. By the very definition of what you will be playing (unreleased, rare, and non-English translated titles) you fall under the hardcore retro gamer category. That’s not what most Ouya buyers will want or use it for. Nope, they will download Super Mario 64, Sonic the Hedgehog, X-Men the Arcade Game, and Final Fantasy VII. The problem is that these games are already available in abundance and some people fought very hard to get them released on current platforms. These games are cheap, each one at or less than $10. As a result, using these games on Ouya is blatant piracy, enforceable by today’s laws because the companies that own them paid to get them converted to modern platforms. You aren’t finding a new way to enjoy your games, you’re too lazy to boot up your Wii and pay to download it. That’s a problem. If you were desperate to enjoy Mother, Policenauts, Sweet Home, or even unfinished demos of Resident Evil 1.5 then I’m totally on your side, but I have yet to see an Ouya video showing off these gems.
Then there’s the quirks of the emulation. I don’t particularly care for the framerate that most PCs and now the Ouya generate when trying to adapt to old school scrolling and resolution. Games look blurry, grainy, and have the stutter you see on games without v-sync or framerate locks on. You can literally watch Super Mario Bros. tear as you run from screen to screen. It’s just a reality of emulation, but one I can’t stand. Virtual Console and a few others have managed to remove this problem, but see the above paragraph as to why this isn’t going to be used by Ouya fans. I also see odd glitches, sounds, and the Playstation 3 controller, as nice as it is, is not an NES, SNES, or Genesis controller for those appropriate titles. For a nitpick like me, emulation is too frustrating to deal with (plus you should only play on a CRT, don’t you know people).
While the Ouya has some fascinating potential and tech fans may be keen on the emulation functions all wrapped into a $100 box, I find it to be a limited and niche product. Any PC built within the last 15 years is capable of the same emulation with no problem whatsoever so it’s not exactly reinventing the wheel. Furthermore the console has little to offer outside emulation and I have a personal issue with any company that’s willing to basically promote piracy in order to sell what is basically a limited all-in-one Android device. I wouldn’t take such issue with the salesmanship of emulation if the Ouya didn’t make it so damn obvious and user friendly to turn an everyday consumer into a rom-hungry pirate. On the other hand it was built for the tech junkies, hardcore gamers, hackers, and basically anyone who will sacrifice loads of time for miniscule dollars, to which I say have at it. For me it’s the opposite, I have almost no time and plenty of dollars so I’ll gladly pay for something that makes its worth obvious with unique software. At this point it belongs next to all those Hong Kong based devices that play illegal games for small prices you see on clearance at mall kiosks and flea markets. Still, this is a new device and it’s hopefully only a matter of time before a slew of justified personalized software hits and makes this more than the shiny piracy box.
At first glance Game Vault, located just outside the core downtown area of Omaha, looks like another clone of GameStop. Upon entering, you may still feel that way as most of the walls are lined with modern PS3, 360, and Wii titles along with a large flat screen television that is displaying an endless playlist of gameplay videos. It wasn’t until I began to browse the large glass cases and have a brief chat with owner Scott, who was the only employee in his store on this brisk Saturday morning, that I learned Omaha has quite a great local game store.
His featured glass case contained a few instantly recognizable gems of retro gaming, such as a boxed complete copy of Earthbound on the SNES (he also had a loose cart for the more budget-conscious), as well as other SNES classics like Super Metroid, Super Mario RPG, and Yoshi’s Island, all boxed and complete. Rarely have I entered a store that not only provided such care on these holy grails of gaming, a few of my friends have been searching for boxed complete copies of these games for years, but his prices were reasonable. It’s not just the SNES that he has to offer, I was stunned to find everything from a stack of Atari 2600 games to a batch of decent 3DO titles and even a Jaguar game or two. In fact, I don’t think it was possible to name a system this guy didn’t have at least a few games for (including PC games, new and old). He even had an import game section that had a mint copy of Dino Crisis on the PS1 from Japan, as if resting on the shelf just for me. Often times when you see stores like this, I remember one in particular in downtown Chicago and another in New York, that you expect heavily inflated prices. Not the case in Game Vault, Scott’s prices are fair, easily topping most of GameStop’s and eBay’s prices, and he doesn’t require a game club membership or anything to get the best price. All in all, Game Vault is one of the most diverse and well stocked used game stores around. I’m now saddened I don’t live in Omaha.
His inventory aside, owner Scott O’Dell knows what makes a good store run. I know this because I saw it firsthand. He’s not an elitist gamer, nor is he a socially awkward super nerd; he’s just a regular guy who is proud of his store. From talking with him and his friendly regulars I was able to discern that he had spent at least a little time at GameStop, but as a responsible business owner he had nothing negative to say about the chain. Instead he focuses on informing his customers of the many benefits, including price, that his store offers. Customer service is one thing, but he also knows his stuff. We chatted for a short time about all kinds of topics from the crazy things he sees come through his doors that people want to sell to the attack of popular games. Scott doesn’t care if you’re there for Call of Duty or Panzer Dragoon Zwei, he just wants to make sure you get what you want. We talked about things like the elitist retro gamer, the massive increase in value of 8-bit and 16-bit era Nintendo carts, and of all things his excitement for Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon. During our entire conversation he never lost sight of the fact that he has a store to run and customers to attend to, politely ducking out of our conversation to help those that came in. That’s good to see because lately I feel that game stores have become the hangout for gamers with no money and lots of time. Employees seem like they would rather chat up nonsense about gaming with non-customers instead of a person like me who is seconds away from dropping $100. It’s the comic shop dilemma, managing your regulars that spend lots of time and little money, with your random customers that could wind up dropping major cash if the circumstance fits. He does the same at the register, chatting up his customers for a brief few moments while the process takes place, then making sure to assist anyone else waiting to check out immediately following. It’s refreshing to meet an owner that is a balanced hybrid between gamer and businessman.
In the end I spent a total of 90 minutes in his store, probably far too long for the amount I spent, and managed to pick up several great items I don’t think I would find anywhere else. Scott recommended Syberia on the Xbox as I discussed my negativity towards retro point-and-click adventures for contemporary players, and I managed to rummage plenty of things I wanted myself. I picked up the aforementioned Japanese Dino Crisis on PS1, an interesting book on the history of Lara Croft (Tomb Raider) for a mere 25 cents, Iron Soldier on the Jaguar, and a copy of Halo: ODST without the multiplayer disc at a heavily discounted price. I noticed he also had tabletop games, which are quickly making a comeback, and after a few minutes of debate as to whether or not to pick up Settlers of Catan, I decided not to on account of the fact I would have to travel with it. Upon checking out Scott mentioned that I had perhaps the most eclectic selection he’s ever seen leave the store, which sums my taste in retro gaming quite nicely. I’m pleased I decided to Google “retro game store omaha” that morning, otherwise I never would have stumbled upon this great brick-and-mortar game store.
This article is my personal impressions of a retro game shop I found while out of town on vacation and is not in any way affiliated with Game Vault or any type of sponsorship. As an avid game collector, I always want to expand my knowledge of game shop locations, especially the ones that get it right, a practice few sites do. If you’re in the Omaha area and want to check out Game Vault, the information on the store is below:
6307 Center St, Suite 102
Omaha, NE 68106
Ron Gilbert, known mostly through the retro circles as the creator of Maniac Mansion and various other games that ran on the SCUMM (Script Creation Utility for Maniac Mansion) engine, said it best way back in 1989 when he wrote his rant entitled “Why Adventure Games Suck.” In it Gilbert attacks the myriad of tropes and issues he foresaw with the very genre that made him famous. It’s quite an impressive read and I suggest you all check it out because there are things he mentions within that piece that are still true today.
All snark aside the point-and-click adventure genre, which saw its largest degree of popularity in the mid-late 80s and early 90s, was always doomed to fail. Not quite a game, not quite a movie (Gilbert is the apparent father of the term “cutscene” because of script he wrote in Maniac Mansion referring to scenes you were forced to watch as “cut-scene”), and despite its general solid writing definitely not a book. It spins a yarn and in many cases tosses in some comedy as one of the only gaming genres that can still control timing without forcefully restricting the player. In concept the genre seems perfectly suited for being a form of interactive fiction and one who hasn’t played these titles may wonder why it performed so poorly and had such a short shelf life in the industry. This is because you haven’t played an adventure game. As enticing as the chuckle-filled story may seem, point-and-click adventure titles were still video games and thus had to adhere to certain rules. No one has quite found the balance and I do believe nostalgia is to blame for the reason anyone still likes these games, because the balance between telling a story and making a game has never found its happy medium. Before you kill me, let me explain.
If you’re going to get started in the point-and-click adventure genre it’s probably best to begin with Gilbert’s first, and probably best, title Maniac Mansion. In it you will select from a series of teenagers sneaking into a house to find the jock’s girlfriend who was abducted shortly before the game begins. As you progress you will encounter various items within the house from the over-sexual Nurse Edna to a tentacle randomly sticking out of the floor (and it talks). Each scenario is more absurd than the last and upon completion of the game, regardless of which ending you get, the impression it leaves is unforgettable. That is, unless you’ve never played it.
If you haven’t then you may have nothing more than a series of turmoil and annoyance at the limited tropes of gameplay that if you don’t give up the game will block progression for you. Maniac Mansion is one of the first titles in a slew of games that had fail states, missed items or scenarios that prevent you from moving forward in the game, hidden clues, impossible puzzles, and plenty more to complain about. Did I mention that when you hit most of these problems you’re never alerted to that fact? Yeah, you can screw up and get stuck in the dungeon for the rest of time but no matter how many hours you spend there the game will never tell you that your attempts are futile. Nope, it’ll let you roam the dungeon, stuck, forever. Perhaps you want to pick up a walkthrough – those are quite popular with the gaming crowd returning to the past. Nope, that won’t help you much either because in trying to figure out where you went wrong you’ll have to read through a step-by-step scenario of how to complete the game, including many actions you may have never encountered or had no idea about, and have all the good parts spoiled for you. Oh yeah, and you still may not be able to pinpoint the mistake that proves you’re stuck for good. This is just Maniac Mansion, I’m not even getting into forgetting to pick up that one item in King’s Quest II that will prevent you from beating the game many hours later or Gabriel Knight 3 that for some reason wants you to copy a driver’s license picture by adding a mustache to the guy on the DL and yourself without so much as a hint. Bulls**t, right?
So why do some people still play these games? As I said before: nostalgia. Either you’ve played the game a million times and you know when to grab that glass or find the key in the envelope, giving those that have never seen the solution and question your logic nothing more than a slight shrug as you do so, or you’ve played so many of these games you’re acutely aware of the tropes. That latter is often still not a sufficient enough asset to justify taking on some of these titles.
Okay so you’ve figured out that your audience needs a little support have you. Perhaps a hint system to get them through or the removal of death states so as not to waste tens of hours as your player fails time and time again. Then you find yourself with the complete opposite problem: it’s boring. Nothing really happens and you never get the satisfaction of solving any puzzles because that stupid hint button is so large and in your face that after a few minutes of frustration you push it. Let’s face it, even as hardcore gamers we only stop ourselves from cheating because there’s no easy way to do so. Near the end of this genre in the 90s, the first game that comes to mind being Phantasmagoria, a horror-esque title from King’s Quest creator Roberta Williams. If you feel the need, and many will, you can literally let the hint system walk you through 90 percent of that game without so much as a single intelligent thought. You might very well need to because adventure fans tend to think themselves above a game like this and those looking for an interesting new computer game weren’t ready for the confines of the genre.
Even nowadays with the resurrection of the point-and-click adventure with pioneer Telltale Games it’s nearly impossible to fail and almost every solution is all but explained to you. This explains why I can’t seem to complete any of the developer’s games (sans the most recent, The Walking Dead) without getting incredibly bored. I feel like I’m just going through the motions, which isn’t satisfactory even when the game is a beloved franchise like Back to the Future. It’s too detailed and long to just walk through it but the “game” part just isn’t all that fun.
Contemporary Adventure and Things to Come
Full disclosure, The Cave, Gilbert’s newest title that promises to re-invent the point-and-click adventure and “get it right” came out today and I have yet to play it. With that in mind, I’m going to proceed with my next comments about the current state of this genre with the caveat that it doesn’t include The Cave.
Nowadays the point-and-click genre is picking up steam again and bold promises come from all around. Telltale is improving, impressing me greatly with last year’s The Walking Dead, and both Tim Schafer (creator of Maniac Mansion‘s sequel Day of the Tentacle) and Ron Gilbert have games on the way. All things considered it’s looking good for fans of the genre but I have yet to see anything that speaks to many of the problems demonstrated here or in Gilbert’s aforementioned essay. The Walking Dead earned game of the year from Spike’s VGAs and yet I still argue it’s not really a video game. Sure, it’s a great title that easily has 2012’s best story, but it’s a lackluster gaming experience at best. It still suffers the tropes of getting you stuck with no idea what to do but also removes any setback of dying and thus can make for some aggravating moments when stuck. Not only that, it’s completely linear, forcing players in a smoke-and-mirrors world where choice seems like an option but the outcome always remains the same. It’s not bad by any means, but it still proves to be tied down to the limits of the genre. These gaming greats of adventure’s past are promising to overcome those obstacles – and my prayers are with them because I personally believe these limitations cannot be overcome due to the nature of the genre – but as it stands this has yet to be accomplished. In the end it’s a lot of promise and a ton of faith with the hope that someone can best a concept that has been around more than 20 years and still can’t find a decent balance.
Perhaps adventure games are not dead. Perhaps they don’t suck. Perhaps there’s some kid out there that can pick up Maniac Mansion tonight on SCUMM VM and after a few hours be changed forever. Somehow, though, I doubt that’s a common case. It just seems like an alternative to the hybrid nerd that loves both literature and gaming – they get a chunk of what they’ve always wanted out of either. Until you see literature buffs pick up a controller or gaming buffs pick up a book as the result of these titles, I’m still not convinced. Oh well, either way, adventure gaming is a thing and there’s a strong loud fan base that will take offense to this blog post ever being written. As for me, I still can’t manage to stomach any title in the genre that I haven’t already beaten back when I was a kid and remember every step required like the muscle memory of riding a bike.
I know it seems like a cop out, but I would like to state for the record that despite my criticism that these titles have not succeeded in the goals they wish to fulfill, that these are in no way poor games. In fact, when compared to many of the time period they were released, they stand out in the group. This also says nothing for the innovation that has been integrated into every genre moving forward from the shooter to even the fighter. Unfortunately this integration has seemed to only limit further the need for the genre overall. There’s a place for adventure games, but it’s a tight niche.
Happy Halloween to all of our lovely retro readers. All month we’ve been chatting about horror gaming, ominous dark rooms, and I’ve been spending one moment in Silent Hill and the next running from the Slenderman. I thought it might be fun to finally offer some retro Halloween gaming for the timid, nervous, screaming little scaredy cats out there. Yep, you read that correctly, here’s a list of fun Halloween videos games that aren’t intended to scare you.
Maniac Mansion (Commodore 64, NES, PC/MAC, iOS/Android)
Way back in 1987, veterans to the industry Ron Gilbert and Tim Schaefer created a little point-and-click adventure game about a group of teenagers that break into the old mansion of Dr. Fred Edison to get back protagonist Dave Miller’s missing girlfriend. Although set in a haunted house that comes complete with blood on the walls, skeletons in the basement, and a hyper-sexualized nurse Maniac Mansion is all in good fun. There are no actual scares and you’ll be laughing hysterically way before you get an opportunity to be scared. Not only was this late 80s PC title a great game to play, but it also was responsible for the creation of Lucasfilm’s infamous “SCUMM” engine (standing for, say it with me kids, Script Creation Utility for Maniac Mansion) that would be utilized in all Lucasfilm adventure games from then on. With a surprising decent port on the NES, plenty of PC ports, a recent enhanced graphics fan re-release, and full compatibility with SCUMMVM on your iOS/Android device, this is a game not to be missed. Unfortunately it has never been (and probably never will) re-released in any way so almost any way you play this game will have to be found by nefarious means, but even creator Ron Gilbert has said that if that’s the only way to play, he’d rather you pirate it than not play it at all.
7th Guest (PC/MAC, CD-I, iOS)
Okay, now I know that this is a horror tale and I know that it’s slated as scary, but in truth this haunted house puzzler is anything but. Consisting of large amounts of cutscenes that re-tell a tale (and even regarded as a FMV title by some), you basically solve a puzzle and get a movie as a reward for a total of 21 puzzles. In fact, the scariest part of the game is trying to figure out the more complex and asinine puzzles at the end, but don’t you dare consult a FAQ, that ruins the whole point of the game. As a scary game the 7th Guest fails on all fronts, and frankly it’s heavily dated even by my tolerably low standards, but there’s still plenty of game to appreciate here and the game is anything but broken. It has recently been resurrected via OS X’s app store for MAC/iOS and all others can pick up the Win XP/Vista/7 compatible port on Good Old Games for $10.
Zombies Ate My Neighbors (SNES, Sega Genesis)
I’m going to get a bit controversial here because everyone I talk to proudly claims that the SNES port is the better game. While I have to give it to the SNES for presentation, actual gameplay still rides in the hands of Sega’s double speed “blast processing”. Full disclosure: I was a Genesis kid growing up and I always prefer violent versions of games over pretty ones (Mortal Kombat only had blood on Sega consoles as did this title) so I’m sure there’s bias buried in there one way or another. Either way, the games are identical save for some graphical differences and every version is wonderfully great. The premise is to take a brother and sister combo, drop them into a world that has seen the apocalypse via cartoony versions of horror movie characters, and have them fight through the hordes to rescue their neighbors. You start off with 10 people to rescue in each level, with a total of 50 levels (55 if you count the bonus ones), and any victims lost remain missing on future levels. From there you basically need to survive (you are given limited lives) and prevent all your neighbors from being killed, it’s as simple as that. I like this game because like other LucasArts titles it takes a basic premise from the old arcade and Atari 2600 days and adapts it to 16-bit consoles for a fun and addicting co-op title. No one is going to be scared by this title, but it will make your nerves stand up on end once you enter those last 15 or so levels – oh, and did I mention no continues and only 5 passwords throughout the whole game? Every time I see this game online or at retro shops it’s just around $10-$15 and you Wii owners can nab it on the Virtual Console (SNES version) for $8.
Haunting Starring Polterguy (Sega Genesis, PSP)
In one of the zaniest Electronic Arts releases I’ve ever seen, Haunting is a thought-provoking game that puts you as lead character Polterguy, a “hip” dead teenager not unlike every mascot Sega ever saw on its Genesis console, in charge of scaring the daylights out of the Sardini family. It’s an isometric haunted house simulator except that you are generating the scares. The goal is to scare all of the family members out of the house before your ecto meter (this title’s version of a timer) depletes and without being seen by the family dog (drains ecto meter and removes fear from family members). The two player mode is interesting because you trade off turns with scares and then go into a dungeon level where you compete for ecto and get to a finish line. If either player dies during the dungeon areas the other player will continue the game in single player. Not a title that most will see the end of, but definitely a fun and amusing game that has a surprising level of violent content and for those that make it to the end an amusing twist. This game is a relatively rare but inexpensive ($10-$15) Genesis cart and a re-release on the EA Replay collection for the PSP that’s roughly the same rarity and price.
Night Trap (Sega CD/32X CD, 3DO, PC)
We have done plenty of coverage on this cult favorite, complete with a full game playthrough, so I’ll just revert you to the article here if you haven’t seen it.
And there you have it! Five solid games for you to run out and pick up (or download) for your retro console of choice this Halloween. It’s not all about scares and trick-or-treat, sometimes horror games can be enjoyed by the whole family, even the house wuss. Any you particularly liked that I haven’t mentioned here? Let us know in the comments below.